4.7 Article

Edaravone attenuates brain edema and neurologic deficits in a rat model of acute intracerebral hemorrhage

期刊

STROKE
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 463-469

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.486654

关键词

behavior; cerebral hemorrhage; edema; oxidative stress; rat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose - Our previous studies have demonstrated that oxidative DNA injury occurs in the brain after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We therefore examined whether edaravone, a free-radical scavenger, could reduce ICH-induced brain injury. Methods - These experiments used pentobarbital-anesthetized, male Sprague-Dawley rats that received an infusion of either 100 mu L autologous whole blood (ICH), FeCl2, or thrombin into the right basal ganglia. The rats were humanely killed 24 hours later. There were 4 sets of experiments. In the first, the dose-dependent effects of edaravone on ICH-induced brain injury were examined by measuring brain edema and neurologic deficits. In the second set, apurinic/apyrimidinic abasic sites and 8-hydroxyl-2'-deoxyguanosine, which are hallmarks of DNA oxidation, were investigated after treatment for ICH. In the third, the effect of delayed treatment with edaravone on ICH-induced injury was determined, whereas the fourth examined the effects of edaravone on iron- and thrombin-induced brain injury. Results - Systemic administration of edaravone immediately or 2 hours after ICH reduced brain water content 24 hours after ICH compared with vehicle (P < 0.05). Edaravone treatment immediately or 2 hours after ICH also ameliorated neurologic deficits (P < 0.05). Edaravone also attenuated ICH-induced changes in apurinic/apyrimidinic abasic sites and 8-hydroxyl-2'-deoxyguanosine and reduced iron- and thrombin-induced brain injury. Conclusions - Edaravone attenuates ICH-induced brain edema, neurologic deficits, and oxidative injury. It also reduces iron- and thrombin-induced brain injury. These results suggest that edaravone is a potential therapeutic agent for ICH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据