4.3 Article

Immune responses to lipopolysaccharide challenge in a tropical rodent (Funambulus pennanti): Photoperiod entrainment and sex differences

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/10253890.2011.606515

关键词

Corticosterone; Funambulus pennanti; immune function; melatonin; pro-inflammatory cytokines; sexual dimorphism

资金

  1. Indian Council Medical Research, New Delhi
  2. Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Annual variation in day length (photoperiod) triggers changes in the immune system of seasonal breeders. The rationale behind this study was to delineate any sex differences in immune responses of photoperiodically entrained animals challenged against lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory stress. We observed that photoperiodically entrained [short day, SD, 10 h light (L):14 h dark (D); long day, LD, 16 h L:8 h D; and natural day length, NDL, 12 h L:12 h D] male and female Indian palm squirrels, Funambulus pennanti, presented sexual dimorphism in immune status after LPS-induced stress. Females presented high humoral (anti-keyhole limpet hemocyanin immunoglobulin) and cellular immunity (lymphocyte proliferation) compared with the males of all photoperiodic conditions. Female squirrels showed reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine levels (interleukin-1 beta, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha) than the males suggesting their high efficiency to recover from LPS-induced inflammatory stress. Increased duration of melatonin secretion and corticosterone concentration in squirrels experiencing SD evidently supported survival of squirrels as compared with control (NDL) and LD squirrels of both sexes. Decreased immune status in both sexes under LD condition might be due to a short melatonin signal mimicking the LDs of summer. Thus, we infer that photoperiodic entrainment via the levels of melatonin and corticosterone synergistically supported more the survival of female squirrels under LPS-induced stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据