4.3 Article

Improved survival in HPV/p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy

期刊

STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE
卷 191, 期 3, 页码 209-216

出版社

URBAN & VOGEL
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-014-0753-7

关键词

Head and neck cancer; Carcinoma, squamous cell; Human papillomavirus; Surgery; Disease-free survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction In the literature, HPV infection and/or p16 positivity have been consistently demonstrated to correlate with improved response rates in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients treated with primary radiotherapy (RT) alone and in combination with chemotherapy. However, the exact role of HPV/p16 positivity in patients treated with postoperative RT is still unclear. Methods We analyzed tumor samples for HPV-DNA and p16 expression and correlated these variables with treatment outcome in a series of 63 consecutively treated oropharyngeal cancer patients (95 % stage III/IV). HPV and p16 analysis were performed using validated test systems. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied to compare the risk of death among patients stratified according to risk factors. Results Expression of p16 or high-risk HPV-DNA was detected in 60.3 % and 39.6 % of the tumors, respectively. p16 expression [overall survival (OS) at 2 years: 91 %] as well as HPV infection (OS at 2 years: 95 %) was associated with improved OS. Mean survival in p16-positive patients was 112 months compared to 64.6 months in case of p16 negativity. All HPV-positive tumors stained positive for p16. In a multivariable analysis, p16 positivity was associated with improved OS and with disease-free survival. Conclusion p16 expression and HPV infection are strongly associated with the outcome of postoperatively irradiated OPSCC patients. HPV and p16 double-negative OPSCC patients should be regarded as a distinct very high-risk patient group that may benefit from intensified or novel treatment combinations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据