4.7 Article

Multi-scale analysis of meteorological drought risks based on a Bayesian interpolation approach in Huai River basin, China

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-014-0877-4

关键词

Drought assessment; Standardized Precipitation Index; Bayesian interpolation; Temporal and spatial patterns; Huai River basin

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51239004, 51009150]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB951102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A scheme for meteorological drought analysis at various temporal and spatial scales based on a spatial Bayesian interpolation of drought severity derived from Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) values at observed stations is presented and applied to the Huai River basin of China in this paper, using monthly precipitation record from 1961 to 2006 in 30 meteorological stations across the basin. After dividing the study area into regular grids, drought condition in gauged sites are classified into extreme, severe, moderate and non drought according to SPIs at month, seasonal and annual time scales respectively while that in ungauged grids are explained as risks of various drought severities instead of single state by a Bayesian interpolation. Subsequently, temporal and spatial patterns of drought risks are investigated statistically. Main conclusions of the research are as follows: (1) drought at seasonal scale was more threatening than the other two time scales with a larger number of observed drought events and more notable variation; (2) results of the Mann-Kendall test revealed an upward trend of drought risk in April and September; (3) there were larger risks of extreme and severe drought in southern and northwestern parts of the basin while the northeastern areas tended to face larger risks of moderate drought. The case study in Huai River basin suggests that the proposed approach is a viable and flexible tool for monitoring meteorological drought at multiple scales with a more specific insight into drought characteristics at each severity level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据