4.7 Article

Temporal and spatial patterns of low-flow changes in the Yellow River in the last half century

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-009-0318-y

关键词

Spatio-temporal changes; Spatio-temporal patterns; Mann-Kendall trend analysis; Wavelet transform analysis; Spatial mapping; Variability; Low-flow changes; The Yellow River

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40830639]
  2. Key Sediment Lab of the Ministry for Water Resources [2008001]
  3. National Key Technology RD Program [2007BAC03A060301]
  4. Ministry of Water Resources [200701039]
  5. Chinese Ministry of Education [308012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low-flow is widely regarded as the primary flow conditions for the anthropogenic and aquatic communities in most rivers, particularly in such an arid and semi-arid area as the Yellow River. This study presents a method integrating Mann-Kendall trend test, wavelet transform analysis and spatial mapping techniques to identify the temporal and spatial patterns of low-flow changes in the Yellow River (1955-2005). The results indicate that: (1) no trend can be identified in the major low-flow conditions in the upper Yellow River, but downward trends can be found in the middle and lower Yellow River; (2) similar periodic patterns are detected in the 7-day minima (AM7Q) in the upper and middle Yellow River, while different patterns are found in the lower Yellow River; (3) the increasing coefficients of variance in the primary low-flow conditions suggest that the variability of the low-flow is increasing from the upper to lower stream; (4) climate change and uneven temporal-spatial patterns of precipitation, jointly with highly intensified water resource utilization, are recognized as the major factors that led to the decrease of low-flow in the lower Yellow River in recent decades. The current investigation should be helpful for regional water resources management in the Yellow River basin, which is characterized by serious water shortage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据