4.7 Article

Using data assimilation method to calibrate a heterogeneous conductivity field and improve solute transport prediction with an unknown contamination source

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-008-0289-4

关键词

Data assimilation; Ensemble Kalman filter; Solute transport; Hydraulic conductivity; Steady-state flow

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) [CXTD-Z2005-2, KZCX2-XB2-09]
  2. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [40528003, 40771036, 40801126]
  3. Florida State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydraulic conductivity distribution and plume initial source condition are two important factors affecting solute transport in heterogeneous media. Since hydraulic conductivity can only be measured at limited locations in a field, its spatial distribution in a complex heterogeneous medium is generally uncertain. In many groundwater contamination sites, transport initial conditions are generally unknown, as plume distributions are available only after the contaminations occurred. In this study, a data assimilation method is developed for calibrating a hydraulic conductivity field and improving solute transport prediction with unknown initial solute source condition. Ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) is used to update the model parameter (i.e., hydraulic conductivity) and state variables (hydraulic head and solute concentration), when data are available. Two-dimensional numerical experiments are designed to assess the performance of the EnKF method on data assimilation for solute transport prediction. The study results indicate that the EnKF method can significantly improve the estimation of the hydraulic conductivity distribution and solute transport prediction by assimilating hydraulic head measurements with a known solute initial condition. When solute source is unknown, solute prediction by assimilating continuous measurements of solute concentration at a few points in the plume well captures the plume evolution downstream of the measurement points.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据