4.2 Article

Hydrogen peroxide signaling mediates DHEA-induced vascular endothelial cell proliferation

期刊

STEROIDS
卷 76, 期 13, 页码 1483-1490

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2011.08.002

关键词

Endothelial cells; Plasma membrane initiated steroid signaling; DHEA; Cyclin D1; Hydrogen peroxide; Cell proliferation

资金

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development,
  2. American Heart Association
  3. NIH [AG18928]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) activates a putative plasma membrane G(i)-protein coupled receptor to induce vascular endothelial proliferation. We now test the hypothesis that hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) signaling mediates this effect. Incubation of EA.hy926 cells, a human vascular endothelial cell line, with DHEA for 5 min produced a significant increase in H2O2 production, measured by oxidation of either p-hydroxyphenylacetate or dichlorodihydrofluorescein. The DHEA effect on H2O2 production was maximal at 1 nM DHEA, was evident within the first minute of incubation, and remained for 10 min. Similar results were present in primary bovine aortic endothelial cells. The induction of H2O2 in EA.hy926 cells was mimicked by a membrane-impermeable albumin-conjugated DHEA and was inhibited by either catalase or pertussis toxin. Incubation of endothelial cells with DHEA for 5 min resulted in a 2-fold increase of cyclin D1 mRNA and protein expression at 4 h. These effects were abolished by co-incubation with catalase. DHEA induced a 50 +/- 7% increase in cell proliferation over 24 h, measured as cellular Ki-67 immunoreactivity. This proliferative effect was abolished by either catalase or pertussis toxin co-incubation, indicating an H2O2 and G(i)-protein-dependent effect. We conclude that H2O2 is a key signaling molecule mediating the proliferative effects of DHEA in vascular endothelial cells, possibly by up-regulating cell-cycle associated genes, such as cyclin D1. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据