4.2 Review

Review of the Y chromosome, Sry and hypertension

期刊

STEROIDS
卷 75, 期 11, 页码 747-753

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2009.10.015

关键词

Blood pressure; Sympathetic nervous system; Renin-angiotensin system; Sry gene complex

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL071579, R01-HL71579-01A3] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The following review examines the role of the SHR Y chromosome and specifically the Sty gene complex in hypertension and potential mechanisms that involve the sympathetic nervous system and renin-angiotensin system. There are consistent gender differences in hypertension, with a greater proportion of males affected than females in most mammalian populations. Our earlier studies demonstrated that a portion of the gender differences in blood pressure (BP) in the SHR rat mapped to the SHR Y chromosome. In rats, males with the SHR Y chromosome have higher BP than females, or males with a different Y chromosome. Consistent with these results, several human population studies have confirmed a Y chromosome effect on BP. Our more recent studies focus on a transcription factor, Sty, as the locus involved in not only BP modulation but effects on other phenotypes. The Sry locus is an evolutionarily conserved locus on the mammalian Y chromosome responsible for testis determination and is a transcription factor. The Sry locus contains a highly conserved High Mobility Group (HMG) box region responsible for DNA binding. Mutations in the HMG box result in sex reversal. We have found multiple functional copies of Sty in SHR and WKY male rats. There is abundant evidence that testes determination may not be Sty's only function as it is expressed in the brain, kidney and adrenal gland of adult males. These findings have potential implications for gender physiology research which involves, the sympathetic nervous system, renin-angiotensin system, androgen receptor regulation and prostate physiology. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据