4.2 Article

Biotransformation of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) with Penicillium griseopurpureum Smith and Penicillium glabrum (Wehmer) Westling

期刊

STEROIDS
卷 75, 期 13-14, 页码 1039-1046

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2010.06.008

关键词

Biotransformation; DHEA; Penicillium griseopurpureum Smith; Penicillium glabrum (Wehmer) Westling; Hydroxylation; Lactonization

资金

  1. National natural Science Foundation of China [20772112]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial transformation of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA, 1) using Penicillium griseopurpureum Smith and Penicillium glabrum (Wehmer) Westling has been investigated. Neither fungi had been examined previously for steroid biotransformation. One novel metabolic product of DHEA (1) transformed with P. griseopurpureum Smith, 15 alpha-hydroxy-17a-oxa-D-homo-androst-4-ene-3,17-dione (5), was reported for the first time. The steroid products were assigned by interpretation of their spectral data such as H-1 NMR, C-13 NMR, IR, and HR-MS spectroscopy. P. griseopurpureum Smith was proven to be remarkably efficient in oxidation of the DHEA (1) into androst-4-en-3,17-dione (2). The strain was also observed to yield different monooxygenases to introduce hydroxyl groups at C-7 alpha, -14 alpha, and -15 alpha positions of steroids. Preference for Baeyer-Villiger oxidation to lactonize D ring and oxidation of the 3 beta-alcohol to the 3-ketone were observed in both incubations. The strain of P. glabrum (Wehmer) Westling catalyzed the steroid 1 to generate both testololactone 3, and D-lactone product with 3 beta-hydroxy-5-en moiety 8. In addition, the strain promoted hydrogenation of the C-5 and C-6 positions, leading to the formation of 3 beta-hydroxy-17a-oxa-D-homo-5 alpha-androstan-3,17-dione (9). The biotransformation pathways of DHEA (1) with P. glabrum (Wehmer) Westling and P. griseopurpureum Smith have been investigated, respectively. Possible metabolic pathways of DHEA (1) were proposed. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据