4.5 Article

Cancer Stem Cells or Tumor Survival Cells?

期刊

STEM CELLS AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 27, 期 21, 页码 1466-1478

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/scd.2018.0129

关键词

cancer stem cell; tumor survival cell; cancer cell survivology; dedifferentiation; stem cell; stemness

资金

  1. DoD
  2. CASIS-NASA
  3. VA RRD
  4. Brain Science Foundation
  5. Gordon Project to Treat Clinical Paralysis at the HMS
  6. SRHN
  7. Wuhan Union Hospital
  8. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), Brazil [2012/50880-4]
  9. H.Z.U.S.T.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research endeavors originally generated stem cell definitions for the purpose of describing normally sustainable developmental and tissue turnover processes in various species, including humans. The notion of investigating cells that possess a vague capacity of stamm (phylum) can be traced back to the late 19th century, mainly concentrating on cells that could produce the germline or the entire blood system. Lately, such undertakings have been recapitulated for oncogenesis, tumor growth, and cancer cell resistance to oncolytic therapies. However, due to the complexity and basic life-origin mechanisms comprising the genetic and epigenetic repertoire of the stemness in every developing or growing cell, presently there are ongoing debates regarding the biological essentials of the stem cell-like tumor initiation cells (ie, cancer stem cells; CSCs). This conceptual analysis focuses on the potential pitfalls of extrapolating that CSCs bear major traits of stemness. We propose a novel nomenclature of Tumor Survival Cells (TSCs) to further define tumor cells behaving like CSCs, based on the ruthless and detrimental features of Cancer Cell Survivology that appears fundamentally different from stem cell biology. Hence, precise academic separation of TSCs from all the stem cell-related labels applied to these unique tumor cells may help to improve scientific reasoning and strategies to decode the desperado-like survival behaviors of TSCs to eventually overcome cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据