4.5 Article

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Friedreich Ataxia Patients Fail to Upregulate Frataxin During In Vitro Differentiation to Peripheral Sensory Neurons

期刊

STEM CELLS AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 22, 期 24, 页码 3271-3282

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/scd.2013.0126

关键词

-

资金

  1. Oesterreichische National bank [14282]
  2. Austrian Science Funds SPIN [FWF W1206-B05, FWF TRP233-B18]
  3. Tiroler Zukunftsstiftung, Austria
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [TRP 233] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [TRP233] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The value of human disease models, which are based on induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), depends on the capacity to generate specifically those cell types affected by pathology. We describe a new iPSC-based model of Friedreich ataxia (FRDA), an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder with an intronic GAA repeat expansion in the frataxin gene. As the peripheral sensory neurons are particularly susceptible to neurodegeneration in FRDA, we applied a development-based differentiation protocol to generate specifically these cells. FRDA and control iPSC lines were efficiently differentiated toward neural crest progenitors and peripheral sensory neurons. The progress of the cell lines through discrete steps of in vitro differentiation was closely monitored by expression levels of key markers for peripheral neural development. Since it had been suggested that FRDA pathology might start early during ontogenesis, we investigated frataxin expression in our development-related model. A pronounced frataxin deficit was found in FRDA iPSCs and neural crest cells compared to controls. Whereas we identified an upregulation of frataxin expression during sensory specification for control cells, this increase was not observed for FRDA peripheral sensory neurons. This early failure, aggravating frataxin deficiency in a specifically vulnerable human cell population, indicates a developmental component in FRDA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据