4.5 Article

Mesenchymal-to-Epithelial Transition Contributes to Endometrial Regeneration Following Natural and Artificial Decidualization

期刊

STEM CELLS AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 964-974

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/scd.2012.0435

关键词

-

资金

  1. Vincent Memorial Research Funds
  2. NIH [HD066297]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite being a histologically dynamic organ, mechanisms coordinating uterine regeneration during the menstrual/estrous cycle and following parturition are poorly understood. In the current study, we hypothesized that endometrial epithelial tissue regeneration is accomplished, in part, by mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET). To test this hypothesis, fate mapping studies were completed using a double transgenic (Tg) reporter strain, Amhr2-Cre; Rosa26-Stop(fl/fl-EYFP) (i.e., flox-stop EYFP reporter). EYFP expression was observed in Mullerian duct mesenchyme-derived stroma and myometrium, but not epithelia in young and peripubertal double Tg female mice. However, mosaic EYFP expression was observed in epithelia of double Tg mice after parturition. To ensure the observed epithelial EYFP expression was not due to leaky Amhr2 promoter activity, resulting in aberrant Cre expression, transgenic mice expressing LacZ under the control of the Amhr2 promoter (Amhr2-LacZ) were used to monitor beta-galactosidase (beta-Gal) activity within the uterus. beta-Gal activity was not detected in luminal or glandular epithelia regardless of age, reproductive status, or degree of damage incurred within the uterus. Lastly, a unique population of transitional cells was identified that expressed the epithelial cell marker, pan-cytokeratin, and the stromal cell marker, vimentin. These cells localized predominantly to the regeneration zone in the mesometrial region of the endometrium. These findings suggest a previously unappreciated role for MET in endometrial regeneration and have important implications for proliferative diseases of the endometrium such as endometriosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据