4.5 Article

In Vitro Electrophysiological Drug Testing Using Human Embryonic Stem Cell Derived Cardiomyocytes

期刊

STEM CELLS AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 161-172

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/scd.2007.0280

关键词

-

资金

  1. Nancy & Stephen Grand Philanthropic Fund
  2. Israel Science Foundation [520/01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pro-arrhythmia (development of cardiac arrhythmias as a pharmacological side effect) has become the single most common cause of the withdrawal or restrictions of previously marketed drugs. The development of new medications, free from these side effects, is hampered by the lack of an in vitro assay for human cardiac tissue. We hypothesized that human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CMs) assessed with a combination of single cell electrophysiology and microelectrode array (MEA) mapping can serve as a novel model for electrophysiological drug screening. Current-clamp studies revealed that E-4031 and Sotalol (IKr blockers) significantly increased hESC-CM's action potential duration and also induced after-depolarizations (the in vitro correlates of increased arrhythmogenic potential). Multicellular aggregates of hESC-CMs were then analyzed with the MEA technique. Application of class I (Quinidine, Procaineamide) and class III (Sotalol) antiarrhythmic agents, E-4031, and Cisapride (a noncardiogenic agent known to lengthen QT) resulted in dose-dependent prolongation of the corrected field potential duration (cFPD). We next utilized the MEA technique to also assess pharmacological effects on conduction. Activation maps demonstrated significant conduction slowing following administration of Na channel blockers (Quinidine and Propafenone) and of the gap junction blocker (1-heptanol). While most attention has been focused on the prospects of using hESC-derived cardiomyocytes for regenerative medicine, this study highlights the possible utilization of these unique cells also for cardiac electrophysiological studies, drug screening, and target validation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据