4.5 Article

In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of Neurally Modified Mesenchymal Stem Cells Induced by Epigenetic Modifiers and Neural Stem Cell Environment

期刊

STEM CELLS AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 1123-1130

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/scd.2007.0212

关键词

-

资金

  1. VA Medical Research and the Department of Neurosurgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-mediated tissue regeneration is a promising strategy to treat several neurodegenerative diseases and traumatic injuries of the central nervous system. Bone marrow MSCs have great potential as therapeutic agents, since they are easy to isolate and expand and are capable of producing various cell types, including neural cells. Recently we developed a highly efficient methodology to produce neural stem-like and neural precursor-like cells from mice bone marrow-derived MSCs that eventually differentiate into neuronaland glial-like cells in vitro. The aim of this study is to further elucidate neural expression profile of neurally induced mesenchymal stem cells (NI-MSCs) and their ability to retain neural differentiation potential when grafted into the intact spinal cord of rats. To this end, we further characterized in vitro and in vivo properties of NI-MSCs by immunocytochemistry, Western blot, ELISA, and immunohistochemistry. Immunocytochemical data demonstrated that NI-MSCs express several mature neural markers such as B3T, GFAP MAP-2, NF-200, and NeuN, which were confirmed through Western blot. ELISA data showed that NI-MSCs release nerve growth factor (NGF) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). In vivo studies demonstrated that grafted NI-MSCs survived after transplantation into intact spinal cord and produced cells that expressed neural markers. All these data suggest that neurally modified MSCs, induced by recently developed methodology, could be a potential source of cells to replace damaged neurons and glia in injured spinal cord, and/or to promote cell survival and axonal growth of host tissue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据