4.7 Article

Proliferation of Human Glioblastoma Stem Cells Occurs Independently of Exogenous Mitogens

期刊

STEM CELLS
卷 27, 期 8, 页码 1722-1733

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1002/stem.98

关键词

Neural stem cell; Brain tumor stem cell; Glioma; Glioblastoma; Mitogen

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. National Cancer Institute of Canada
  3. Terry Fox Foundation
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  5. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research Clinical Fellowship
  6. Clinical Investigator and Scientist Awards

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Primary glial tumors of the central nervous system, most commonly glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), are aggressive lesions with a dismal prognosis. Despite identification and isolation of human brain tumor stem cells (BTSCs), characteristics that distinguish BTSCs from neural stem cells remain to be elucidated. We cultured cells isolated from gliomas, using the neurosphere culture system, to understand their growth requirements. Both CD133(+) and CD133(-) adult GBM BTSCs proliferated in the absence of exogenous mitogenic stimulation and gave rise to multipotent GBM spheres that were capable of self-renewal. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and fibroblast growth factor-2 enhanced GBM BTSC survival, proliferation, and subsequent sphere size. Blockade of EGF receptor (EGFR) signaling reduced exogenous mitogen-independent GBM sphere growth. Implantation of as few as 10 exogenous mitogen-independent GBM BTSCs led to the formation of highly invasive intracranial tumors, which closely resembled human GBMs, in immunocompromised mice. These results demonstrate that exogenous mitogen independence, mediated in part through EGFR signaling, is one characteristic that distinguishes CD133(+) and CD133(-) GBM BTSCs from neural stem cells. This novel experimental system will permit the elucidation of additional constitutively activated mechanisms that promote GBM BTSC survival, self-renewal, and proliferation. STEM CELLS 2009; 27:1722-1733

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据