4.7 Article

Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand Promotes Migration of Human Bone Marrow Multipotent Stromal Cells

期刊

STEM CELLS
卷 26, 期 11, 页码 2955-2963

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0512

关键词

Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand; Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptors; Multipotent precursor; Mesenchymal stem cells; Migration

资金

  1. Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro
  2. Programma di Ricerca Regione Universita

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adult multipotent stromal cells (MSCs), also known as mesenchymal stem cells, represent an important source of cells for the repair of a number of damaged tissues. Both bone marrow (BM)-derived and amniotic MSCs expressed detectable surface levels of two (tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 2 [TRAIL-R2] and TRAIL-R4) of four transmembrane TRAIL receptors. Although the best-characterized activity of TRAIL-R2 is the transduction of apoptotic signals, neither recombinant TRAIL (rTRAIL) nor infection with an adenovirus-expressing TRAIL induced cytotoxic effects on MSCs. Moreover, whereas rTRAIL did not affect proliferation or differentiation of MSCs along the osteogenic and adipogenic lineages, it significantly promoted the migration of human MSCs in range of concentrations comparable to that of soluble TRAIL in human plasma (100 pg/ml). Since rTRAIL induced the rapid phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 ( ERK1/2) in MSC cultures and pretreatment with pharmacological inhibitors of the ERK1/2 pathway efficiently counteracted the rTRAIL-induced human MSC migration, these data indicate that ERK1/2 is involved in mediating the ability of rTRAIL to stimulate MSC migration. Taking into consideration that the soluble factors able to induce MSC migration have not been extensively characterized, our current data indicate that the TRAIL/TRAIL-R system might play an important role in the biology of MSCs. STEM CELLS 2008;26:2955-2963

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据