4.3 Article

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Equine Fibroblasts

期刊

STEM CELL REVIEWS AND REPORTS
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 693-702

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12015-011-9239-5

关键词

Induced pluripotent stem cells; iPS cells; Equine; Horse; Transposon; Tetracycline inducible; Non-viral; PiggyBac

资金

  1. Canadian Stem Cell Network
  2. Canadian Research Chair in Stem Cells and Regeneration
  3. Canadian Research Chair in Animal Cloning and Stem Cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The domesticated horse represents substantial value for the related sports and recreational fields, and holds enormous potential as a model for a range of medical conditions commonly found in humans. Most notable of these are injuries to muscles, tendons, ligaments and joints. Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells have sparked tremendous hopes for future regenerative therapies of conditions that today are not possible to cure. Equine iPS (EiPS) cells, in addition to bringing promises to the veterinary field, open up the opportunity to utilize horses for the validation of stem cell based therapies before moving into the human clinical setting. In this study, we report the generation of iPS cells from equine fibroblasts using a piggyBac (PB) transposon-based method to deliver transgenes containing the reprogramming factors Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc, expressed in a temporally regulated fashion. The established iPS cell lines express hallmark pluripotency markers, display a stable karyotype even during long-term culture, and readily form complex teratomas containing all three embryonic germ layer derived tissues upon in vivo grafting into immunocompromised mice. Our EiPS cell lines hold the promise to enable the development of a whole new range of stem cell-based regenerative therapies in veterinary medicine, as well as aid the development of preclinical models for human applications. EiPS cell could also potentially be used to revive recently extinct or currently threatened equine species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据