4.5 Article

Mathematical Modeling and Exergy Analysis of Blast Furnace Operation With Natural Gas Injection

期刊

STEEL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 84, 期 4, 页码 333-343

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/srin.201200172

关键词

blast furnace; low carbon emission ironmaking; natural gas injection; raceway mathematical model; multi-fluid blast furnace model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50804008]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-08-0099]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N110602004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blast furnace operation with natural gas (NG) injection is one of the effective measures to save energy, reduce CO2 emission, and decrease environmental load for iron and steel industry. Numerical simulations on blast furnace operation with NG injection through tuyeres are performed in this paper by raceway mathematical model, multi-fluid blast furnace model, and exergy analytical model. With increasing NG injection volume, the simulation results are shown as follows: (1) the theoretical flame temperature and bosh gas volume can be constant by decreasing blast volume and increasing oxygen enrichment. (2) The utilization rate of CO enhances while that of H2 decreases. The proportion of H2 in indirect reduction tends to be increased, which accelerates the reduction of burdens. The pressure drop shows that the permeability of blast furnace gets better. The blast furnace productivity is increased from 2.07 to 3.08t center dot m3 center dot day1. The silicon content in hot metal is decreased from 0.26% to 0.05%. When BF operation with 125.4kg center dot tHM1 NG injection, coke rate and carbon emission rate are decreased by 27.2% and 32.2%, respectively. (3) The thermodynamic perfection degree is increased from 88.40% to 90.50%, the exergy efficiency is decreased from 51.94% to 49.02% and the chemical exergy of top gas is increased from 4.69 to 6.22GJ center dot tHM1. It is important to strengthen the recycling of top gas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据