期刊
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
卷 33, 期 18, 页码 3061-3077出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sim.6177
关键词
diagnostic meta-analysis; publication bias; diagnostic odds ratio; trim and fill; simulation study
类别
资金
- DFG [HO 1286/7-2]
The present study investigates the performance of several statistical tests to detect publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis by means of simulation. While bivariate models should be used to pool data from primary studies in diagnostic meta-analysis, univariate measures of diagnostic accuracy are preferable for the purpose of detecting publication bias. In contrast to earlier research, which focused solely on the diagnostic odds ratio or its logarithm (ln omega), the tests are combined with four different univariate measures of diagnostic accuracy. For each combination of test and univariate measure, both type I error rate and statistical power are examined under diverse conditions. The results indicate that tests based on linear regression or rank correlation cannot be recommended in diagnostic meta-analysis, because type I error rates are either inflated or power is too low, irrespective of the applied univariate measure. In contrast, the combination of trim and fill and ln omega has non-inflated or only slightly inflated type I error rates and medium to high power, even under extreme circumstances (at least when the number of studies per meta-analysis is large enough). Therefore, we recommend the application of trim and fill combined with ln omega to detect funnel plot asymmetry in diagnostic meta-analysis. Copyright (C) 2014 JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据