4.5 Article

Weighted hurdle regression method for joint modeling of cardiovascular events likelihood and rate in the US dialysis population

期刊

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
卷 33, 期 25, 页码 4387-4401

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/sim.6232

关键词

cardiovascular outcomes; dialysis; end-stage renal disease; hurdle model; infection; Poisson regression; United States Renal Data System

资金

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institute of Health [UL1 TR000153]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R01 DK092232, K23 DK093584]
  3. Dialysis Clinics, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a new weighted hurdle regression method for modeling count data, with particular interest in modeling cardiovascular events in patients on dialysis. Cardiovascular disease remains one of the leading causes of hospitalization and death in this population. Our aim is to jointly model the relationship/association between covariates and (i) the probability of cardiovascular events, a binary process, and (ii) the rate of events once the realization is positivewhen the hurdle' is crossedusing a zero-truncated Poisson distribution. When the observation period or follow-up time, from the start of dialysis, varies among individuals, the estimated probability of positive cardiovascular events during the study period will be biased. Furthermore, when the model contains covariates, then the estimated relationship between the covariates and the probability of cardiovascular events will also be biased. These challenges are addressed with the proposed weighted hurdle regression method. Estimation for the weighted hurdle regression model is a weighted likelihood approach, where standard maximum likelihood estimation can be utilized. The method is illustrated with data from the United States Renal Data System. Simulation studies show the ability of proposed method to successfully adjust for differential follow-up times and incorporate the effects of covariates in the weighting. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据