4.5 Article

A marginal structural model for multiple-outcome survival data:assessing the impact of injection drug use on several causes of death in the Canadian Co-infection Cohort

期刊

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 1409-1425

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sim.6043

关键词

confounding; competing risks; time-dependent confounding; failure-time data; survival analysis; simulation; multiple-outcome data; longitudinal data; marginal structural models; inverse-probability weighting; intermediate variables; causal inference

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. Chercheur-Boursier career award from the Fonds de recherche en sante du Quebec (FRSQ)
  3. Chercheur-National career award from the FRSQ
  4. Reseau SIDA/maladies infectieuses of the FRSQ
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP-79529]
  6. CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network [CTN222]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is often the case that interest lies in the effect of an exposure on each of several distinct event types. For example, we are motivated to investigate in the impact of recent injection drug use on deaths due to each of cancer, end-stage liver disease, and overdose in the Canadian Co-infection Cohort (CCC). We develop a marginal structural model that permits estimation of cause-specific hazards in situations where more than one cause of death is of interest. Marginal structural models allow for the causal effect of treatment on outcome to be estimated using inverse-probability weighting under the assumption of no unmeasured confounding; these models are particularly useful in the presence of time-varying confounding variables, which may also mediate the effect of exposures. An asymptotic variance estimator is derived, and a cumulative incidence function estimator is given. We compare the performance of the proposed marginal structural model for multiple-outcome data to that of conventional competing risks models in simulated data and demonstrate the use of the proposed approach in the CCC. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据