4.5 Article

Fast linear mixed model computations for genome-wide association studies with longitudinal data

期刊

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 165-180

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/sim.5517

关键词

genome-wide association; longitudinal studies; conditional linear mixed model

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research NWO Investments [175.010.2005.011, 911-03-012]
  2. Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly [014-93-015]
  3. Netherlands Genomics Initiative (NGI)/Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [050-060-810]
  4. Erasmus Medical Center
  5. Netherlands Organization for the Health Research and Development (ZonMw)
  6. Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (RIDE)
  7. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science
  8. Ministry for Health, Welfare and Sports
  9. European Commission (DG XII)
  10. Municipality of Rotterdam
  11. German Bundesministerium fuer Forschung und Technology [01 AK 803 A-H, 01 IG 07015 G]
  12. Erasmus University, Rotterdam

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome-wide association studies are characterized by a huge number of statistical tests performed to discover new disease-related genetic variants [in the form of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)] in human DNA. Many SNPs have been identified for cross-sectionally measured phenotypes. However, there is a growing interest in genetic determinants of the evolution of traits over time. Dealing with correlated observations from the same individual, we need to apply advanced statistical techniques. The linear mixed model is popular but also much more computationally demanding than fitting a linear regression model to independent observations. We propose a conditional two-step approach as an approximate method to explore the longitudinal relationship between the trait and the SNP. In a simulation study, we compare several fast methods with respect to their accuracy and speed. The conditional two-step approach is applied to relate SNPs to longitudinal bone mineral density responses collected in the Rotterdam Study. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据