3.9 Article

Optimizing threshold-schedules for sequential approximate Bayesian computation: applications to molecular systems

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/sagmb-2012-0043

关键词

dynamical system; parameter inference; unscented transform

资金

  1. BBSRC [BB/K003909/1]
  2. MRC
  3. Royal Society
  4. BBSRC [BB/G007934/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [G1002092] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K003909/1, BB/G007934/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G1002092] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The likelihood-free sequential Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) algorithms are increasingly popular inference tools for complex biological models. Such algorithms proceed by constructing a succession of probability distributions over the parameter space conditional upon the simulated data lying in an epsilon-ball around the observed data, for decreasing values of the threshold epsilon. While in theory, the distributions (starting from a suitably defined prior) will converge towards the unknown posterior as epsilon tends to zero, the exact sequence of thresholds can impact upon the computational efficiency and success of a particular application. In particular, we show here that the current preferred method of choosing thresholds as a predetermined quantile of the distances between simulated and observed data from the previous population, can lead to the inferred posterior distribution being very different to the true posterior. Threshold selection thus remains an important challenge. Here we propose that the threshold-acceptance rate curve may be used to determine threshold schedules that avoid local optima, while balancing the need to minimise the threshold with computational efficiency. Furthermore, we provide an algorithm based upon the unscented transform, that enables the threshold-acceptance rate curve to be efficiently predicted in the case of deterministic and stochastic state space models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据