4.3 Article

Production and characterization of raw starch degrading enzyme from a newly isolated thermophilic filamentous bacterium, Laceyella sacchari LP175

期刊

STARCH-STARKE
卷 67, 期 3-4, 页码 255-266

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/star.201400150

关键词

Optimization and characterization; Raw starch degrading enzyme; Thermophilic filamentous bacterium; Laceyella sacchari; LP175; Response surface methodology

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund through the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program [PHD/0157/2554]
  2. Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI)
  3. Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University
  4. Outbound Research Student Exchange (ORSE) Scholarship from the Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Medium optimization for production of raw starch degrading enzyme (RSDE) from a newly isolated thermophilic filamentous bacterium, Laceyella sacchari LP175, is described. Yeast extract and raw cassava starch were found to be the best nitrogen and carbon sources, respectively, for enzyme production. Response surface methodology with Plackett-Burman design and central composite design showed that an optimized concentration of 4.93g/L raw cassava starch and 2.8g/L yeast extract in basal medium yielded 181.1U/mL RSDE activity in a shaking flask at 50 degrees C and pH 7.0 after 48h. Maximum RDSE activity in crude enzyme was achieved at pH 6.5 and 50 degrees C. The major end product of raw cassava starch hydrolysis was maltose (88%). The K-m and K-i values of raw cassava starch and maltose, respectively, were found to be 2.85mg/mL and 1.04mg/mL. Raw cassava starch at 100g/L was hydrolyzed with 200U/mL RSDE for 12h, yielding 36.8% hydrolysis. The addition of commercial glucoamylase (1.6U/mL) synergistically enhanced the hydrolysis reaction, yielding 70% hydrolysis (equivalent to 78.0g/L glucose). The high efficiency of RSDE produced from L. sacchari LP175 could be useful for replacing conventional enzymes currently used in various raw starch processing industries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据