3.9 Article

Efficiency of Fenticonazole for the Treatment of Vaginal Candidiasis

期刊

SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO
卷 140, 期 7-8, 页码 469-474

出版社

SRPSKO LEKARSKO DRUSTVO
DOI: 10.2298/SARH1208469Z

关键词

vaginal candidiasis; treatment; symptoms; itching; vaginal secretion; vaginal smear

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis appears in 75% women of reproductive age. The most frequent causes are Candida albicans (85-95%) or C. glabrata, and infrequently C. krusei, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. pseudotropicalis, etc. Objective The aim of the study was to investigate efficiency and safety of fenticonazole for vaginal candidiasis treatment. Methods Therapeutic effect of a single 600 mg fenticonasole vaginal capsule was observed in 417 women, aged 16-67, in five centers in Serbia. In all women, before the treatment, vaginal candidiasis was confirmed by testing of vaginal smear. Based on smear findings and associated symptoms observed on the 7th and 28th day after therapy administration, treatment results were evaluated. On the next day after drug application the patients recorded by using a questionnaire their own feelings on withdrawal symptoms and possible side effects in the period prior to the first control. Results Control after seven days showed a statistically significant decrease of symptoms. In 385 women, vaginal smear was found negative to yeast and yeast blastospores. Within the first seven days after treatment 84 women had to repeat therapy due to the persistence of symptoms or positive vaginal smear. After 28 days we recorded full recovery in 392 patients, clinical improvement in eight, no change in 16, and deterioration in one patient only. Side effects were very seldom, mostly in the form of a slight redness of the vulva and vagina, and mild itching during several days. Conclusion Our observations confirmed good efficacy and safety of fenticonazole in the treatment of vaginal candidiasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据