4.6 Article

Fostering change in back pain beliefs and behaviors: when public education is not enough

期刊

SPINE JOURNAL
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 979-988

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.09.001

关键词

Mass media; Social marketing; Back pain; Behavior change; public policy; Public education

资金

  1. ANZ Trustees Medical Research & Technology in Victoria Program-The Appel Family Bequest
  2. Arthritis Australia
  3. Monash University
  4. Australian Government, Department of Health Aging
  5. NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mass media campaigns designed to alter societal views and individual behaviors about back pain have been undertaken and evaluated in multiple countries. In contrast to the original Australian campaign, subsequent campaigns have been less successful, with improvements observed in beliefs without the corresponding changes in related behaviors. This article summarizes the results of a literature review, expert panel, and workshop held at the Melbourne International Forum XI: Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain in March 2011 on the role and interplay of various social behavior change strategies, including public education, law and legislation, healthy public policy, and social marketing in achieving a sustained reduction in the societal burden of back pain. Given the complexities inherent to health-related behaviors change, the Rothschild framework is applied in which behavior change strategies are viewed on a continuum from public education at one end through law and health policy at the other. Educational endeavors should likely be augmented with social marketing endeavors and supportive laws and health policy to foster sustained change in outcomes such as work disability and health utilization. Practical suggestions are provided for future interventions aimed at changing back pain-related behaviors. Evaluation of previous back pain mass media campaigns reveals that education alone is unlikely to foster positive and persisting behavioral change without concomitant strategies. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据