4.6 Article

Presurgical biopsychosocial variables predict medical, compensation, and aggregate costs of lumbar discectomy in Utah workers' compensation patients

期刊

SPINE JOURNAL
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 395-401

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.03.018

关键词

Biopsychosocial; Costs; Lumbar discectomy; Workers' compensation

资金

  1. Utah State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Elective lumbar discectomy among injured workers is a prevalent spine surgery that often requires a lengthy rehabilitation. It is important to determine presurgical biopsychosocial predictors of compensation and medical costs in such patients. PURPOSE: To determine if presurgical biopsychosocial variables are predictive of compensation and medical costs in a cohort of Utah patients who have undergone open or microlumbar discectomy that are receiving workers' compensation. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A retrospective cohort study consisting of a review of presurgical medical records and accrued medical and compensation costs. PATIENT SAMPLE: A consecutive sample of 266 compensated workers from Utah who had undergone either open discectomy or microlumbar discectomy from 1994 to 2000. All patients were at least 2 years postsurgery at the time of follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Total accrued medical, compensation, and aggregate costs. METHODS: A retrospective review of presurgical biopsychosocial variables and total accrued medical, compensation, and aggregate costs. RESULTS: Presurgical variables were statistically significantly correlated with medical and compensation costs. Multiple linear regression models accounted for 31% of variation in compensation costs, 32% in medical costs, and 43% in total aggregate costs. CONCLUSIONS: Presurgical biopsychosocial variables are important predictors of compensated lumbar discectomy costs. Medical cost control programs might benefit from identifying biopsychosocial variables related to increased costs. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据