4.5 Article

The adjunctive effect of a binding peptide on bone morphogenetic protein enhanced bone healing in a rodent model of spinal fusion

期刊

SPINE
卷 33, 期 16, 页码 1709-1713

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817e9dfd

关键词

rhBMP-2; bone morphogenetic binding peptide; spinal fusion; adjuvant

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [5R21AR53259] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Design. A prospective 8-week interventional trial employing a rat model of spinal fusion to test the effect on bone morphogenetic protein binding peptide (BBP) on rhBMP-2 induced bone healing. Objectives. To determine if the addition of BBP to the collagen sponges used as a carrier for rhBMP-2 reduces the amount of rhBMP-2 required to achieve a satisfactory clinical outcome. Summary of Background Data. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) although effective in promoting osseous growth and spinal fusion have limitations in their extensive use because of higher costs and possible adverse effects including ectopic bone formation and local inflammatory reaction, particularly in the cervical spine. Methods. Posterolateral intertransverse process spinal fusion at L4-L5 was performed in Lewis rats. Two doses of BBP (500 mu g, and 1000 mu g) were tested with or without low dose (1 mu g) rhBMP-2 and the results were compared with the low dose (1 mu g) rhBMP-2. Fusion was evaluated by radiology, histology, and manual palpation tests. Results. Radiology revealed significant earlier fusion with 1000 mu g BBP + 1 mu g BMP-2 combination when compared with low dose BMP-2 (1 mu g) only (P < 0.05). Manual palpation and histology at eighth week revealed higher rate of fusion with the same combination with a nearly significant difference (P = 0.057). Conclusion. Specific growth factor binding agents, such as BBP, can be compounded into carriers used in fusion procedures to decrease the dosage of BMP and possibly decrease the side effects which are most likely dose-related. This may also decrease costs and improve clinical outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据