4.3 Article

Independent spinal cord atrophy measures correlate to motor and sensory deficits in individuals with spinal cord injury

期刊

SPINAL CORD
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 70-75

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sc.2010.87

关键词

SCI; MRI; clinical outcome; atrophy

资金

  1. The Ludvig and Sara Elsass Foundation, Denmark
  2. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  3. The Lundbeck Foundation
  4. Lundbeck Foundation [R17-2007-1690] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study design: Cross-sectional descriptive analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical outcome. Objectives: The aim of this study was to present anatomically consistent and independent spinal cord atrophy measures based on standard MRI material and analyze their specific relations to sensory and motor outcome in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). Setting: Danish study on human SCI. Methods: We included 19 individuals with chronic incomplete SCI and 16 healthy controls. Participants underwent MRI and a neurological examination including sensory testing for light touch and pinprick, and muscle strength. Antero-posterior width (APW), left-right width (LRW) and cross-sectional spinal cord area (SCA) were extracted from MRI at the spinal level of C2. The angular variation of the spinal cord radius over the full circle was also extracted and compared with the clinical scores. Results: The motor score was correlated to LRW and the sensory scores were correlated to APW. The scores correlated also well with decreases in spinal cord radius in oblique angles in coherent and non-overlapping sectors for the sensory and motor qualities respectively. Conclusion: APW and LRW can be used to assess sensory and motor function independently. The finding is corresponding well with the respective locations of the main sensory and motor pathways. Spinal Cord (2011) 49, 70-75; doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.87; published online 10 August 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据