4.3 Article

Functional abilities, incidences of complications and falls of patients with spinal cord injury 6 months after discharge

期刊

SPINAL CORD
卷 49, 期 4, 页码 520-524

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sc.2010.163

关键词

spinal cord injury; rehabilitation; functional ability; medical complication; fall

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund (TRF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study design: A prospective study. Objectives: To evaluate the changes of functional abilities, incidences of complications and falls of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) 6 months after discharge. Setting: A major tertiary referral hospital, Thailand. Methods: Forty-four patients with SCI completed the study. Their average age and post-injury time were 45.23 +/- 13.78 years and 51.52 +/- 47.87 months respectively. Functional abilities of the subjects were measured by using the Spinal Cord Independence Measure II (SCIM II). Incidences of complications and falls were prospectively assessed every month by using a questionnaire. Results: After 6 months, the SCIM II scores of subjects showed a slight decrease (58.60 +/- 21.22-58.37 +/- 22.06 scores). The significant decrement was illustrated in self-care and mobility scores of subjects with chronic motor incomplete SCI (P < 0.05). Forty subjects experienced at least one medical complication (range 1-5 times) which 11 of them had to re-admit for 3-30 days. Twenty-four subjects sustained at least one fall in 6 months (range 1-24 times) which one subject had metatarsal bone fracture after fall. Conclusion: The functional ability of subjects with SCI, particularly those with chronic motor incomplete SCI, significantly decreased after discharge. The subjects also encountered a high risk of complications and falls that might associate with the decrement of functional ability. The findings confirmed important roles of community rehabilitation after discharge. Spinal Cord (2011) 49, 520-524; doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.163; published online 14 December 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据