4.3 Article

A longitudinal study of skeletal muscle following spinal cord injury and locomotor training

期刊

SPINAL CORD
卷 46, 期 7, 页码 488-493

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102169

关键词

spinal cord injury; skeletal muscle; locomotor training

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01HD37645, R01HD40850, P01 HD059751] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study design: Experimental rat model of spinal cord contusion injury (contusion SCI). Objective: The objectives of this study were (1) to characterize the longitudinal changes in rat lower hindlimb muscle morphology following contusion SCI by using magnetic resonance imaging and (2) to determine the therapeutic potential of two types of locomotor training, treadmill and cycling. Setting: University research setting. Methods: After moderate midthoracic contusion SCI,Sprague- Dawley rats were assigned to either treadmill training, cycle training or an untrained group. Lower hindlimb muscle size was examined prior to SCI and at 1-, 2-, 4-, 8-, and 12- week post injury. Results: Following contusion SCI, we observed significant atrophy in all rat hindlimb muscles with the posterior muscles ( triceps surae and flexor digitorum) showing greater atrophy than the anterior muscles ( tibialis anterior and extensor digitorum). The greatest amount of atrophy was measured at 2- week post injury ( range from 11 to 26%), and spontaneous recovery in muscle size was observed by 4 weeks post-SCI. Both cycling and treadmill training halted the atrophic process and accelerated the rate of recovery. The therapeutic influence of both training interventions was observed within 1 week of training and no significant difference was noted between the two interventions, except in the tibialis anterior muscle. Finally, a positive correlation was found between locomotor functional scores and hindlimb muscle size following SCI. Conclusions: Both treadmill and cycle training diminish the extent of atrophy and facilitate muscle plasticity after contusion SCI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据