4.7 Article

Molecular orbital studies (hardness, chemical potential and electrophilicity), vibrational investigation and theoretical NBO analysis of 4-4′-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl methylene) dibenzonitrile based on abinitio and DFT methods

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2013.10.007

关键词

FT-IR; FT-Raman; DFT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and FT Raman (FTR) of 4-4'-(1H-1, 2, 4-triazol-1-yl methylene) dibenzonitrile (4-HTMDBN) have been recorded and analyzed. The equilibrium geometry harmonic vibrational frequencies have been investigated with the help of standard HF and DFT methods with 6-31G(d,p) as basis set. The assignments of the vibrational spectra have been carried out with the help of normal co-ordinate analysis (NCA) following the scaled quantum mechanical force field methodology (SQMFF). Theoretical simulations of the FTIR and FIR spectra of the title compound have been calculated. The H-1 and C-13 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) chemical shifts of the molecule were calculated by the Gauge including atomic orbital (CIAO) method. The stability of the molecule has been analyzed using natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis. The linear polarizability (alpha) and the first order hyperpolarizability (beta) values of the investigated molecule have been computed using HF/DFT/6-31G(d,p) methods on the finite field approach. UV-Vis spectrum of the compound is recorded and the electronic properties such as HOMO and LUMO energies, are performed. The directly calculated ionization potential (IP), electron affinity (EA), electronegativity (chi), electrophilicity index (omega), hardness (eta) and chemical potential (rho) are all correlated with the HOMO and LUMO energies with their molecular properties. Mulliken population analysis on atomic charges, molecular electrostatic potential maps (MEP) and thermodynamical properties of title compound at different temperature have been calculated. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据