4.7 Article

Vibrational, NMR spectrum and orbital analysis of 3,3′,5,5′-tetrabromobisphenol A: A combined experimental and computational study

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2012.12.004

关键词

3,3 ',5,5 '-Tetrabromobisphenol A; Density functional theory; Vibrational spectrum; NMR; NBO; Orbital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work, the experimental and theoretical studies on the structure, vibrations, NMR and HOMO-LUMO analysis of 3,3',5,5'-tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) are presented. The FT-IR (400-4000 cm(-1)) and FT-Raman (100-4000 cm(-1)) spectra of TBBPA were recorded. The molecular geometry, vibrational frequencies were calculated by using density functional theory (DFT) method with the 6-31G(d) basis set. The optimized geometric properties, scaled vibrational wavenumbers, IR intensities, Raman activities show good agreement with the experimental data. The assigned vibrational modes of the IR and Raman spectra were compared with the corresponding properties of the polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs). Comparative analysis indicated that the red shift of C-Br vibration could probably be ascribed to the further electronic density equalization due to the p-pi conjugation between O atom and the benzene. The natural bonding orbital (NBO) analysis demonstrated that the intermolecular hyperconjugative interactions are mainly formed by the orbital overlap between sigma (O-H), sigma* (C-C), pi (C-C), pi* (C-C) bond orbitals. Compared to the higher E-(2) value (33.65-34.82 kcal/mol) originated from LP(2)O to pi* (C-C), the one (E-(2): 8.23-9.73 kcal/mol) from LP(3)Br and pi* (C-C) contributes to the preferential tendency of C-Br breakage to the C-O breakage in the transformation. The calculated NMR results obtained on the 6-31G(d) level proves good agreement with the experimental data (r(2) = 0.999). Analysis of isosurface of the related orbital shows that all the main excitation exhibit pi-pi* character localized on the benzene rings. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据