4.7 Article

Validation of origins of tea samples using partial least squares analysis and Euclidean distance method with near-infrared spectroscopy data

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2011.10.056

关键词

Near-infrared spectroscopy; Partial least squares (PLS); Euclidean distance; Identification; Origin; Tea

资金

  1. Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province of China [2008C12070]
  2. Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System of China
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China
  4. Jiangsu PhD Gathering Program of China [179]
  5. Suzhou Engineering Research Center for Modern Ecological Tea Industry, China [SZGD201067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In today's global food markets, the ability to trace the origins of agricultural products is becoming increasingly important. We developed an efficient procedure for validating the authenticity and origin of tea samples where Partial Least Squares and Euclidean Distance methods, based on near-infrared spectroscopy data, were combined to classify tea samples from different tea producing areas. Four models for identification of authenticity of tea samples were constructed and utilized in our two-step procedure. High accuracy rates of 98.60%, 97.90%, 97.55%, and 99.83% for the calibration set, and 97.19%, 97.54%, 97.83%, 100% for test set, were achieved. After the first identification step, employing the four origin authenticity models, followed by the second step using the Euclidean Distance method, accuracy rates for specific origin identification were 98.43% in the calibration set and 96.84% in the test set. This method, employing two-step analysis of multi-origin model, accurately identified the origin of tea samples collected in four different areas. This study provided a potential reference method for the detection of geographical indication of agricultural products' and is available for use in traceability of origin studies. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据