4.7 Article

Fluorescence resonance energy-transfer affects the determination of the affinity between ligand and proteins obtained by fluorescence quenching method

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2009.09.003

关键词

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer; Fluorescence quenching; Esculin; Serum albumins

资金

  1. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission
  2. Shanghai Education Development Foundation [09CG46]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interaction between esculin and serum albumins was investigated to Illustrate that the fluorescence resonance energy-transfer(FRET) affects the determination of the binding constants obtained by fluorescence quenching method The binding constants (K.) obtained by the double-logarithm curve for esculin-BSA and esculin-HSA were 1 02 x 10(7) and 2.07 x 10(4) L/mol. respectively These results from synchronous fluorescence showed that the Tyr and Trp residues of HSA were affected more deeply than those in BSA The excitation profile of esculin showed that in the presence of BSA and HSA, the S-0 -> S-1 transition of esculin (lambda(max)(ex) approximate to 340 nm) appears, which is similar to the lambda(max)(em) of BSA and HSA. The critical distance (R-0) between BSA and esculin is higher than that of HSA, which showed that the affinity of esculin and HSA should be higher than that of BSA After centrifugation. the concentrations of esculin bound to albumins were determined by means of the fluorescence of esculin. It was found that Much more esculin was bound to HSA than to BSA However. the bound models for BSA and HSA are almost the same The concentration of esculin bound to serum albumin at first decreased with :he addition of esculin and then increased From above results, If can be concluded that the affinity of esculin and HSA should be higher than that of esculin and BSA This example showed that in the presence of FRET. the binding constants between ligands and proteins based Oil fluorescence quenching might be deviated (C) 2009 Elsevier B V All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据