4.6 Article

Health effects of home energy efficiency interventions in England: a modelling study

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007298

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Commission [265325]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/I038810/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/K011839/1]
  4. RCUK Centre for Energy Epidemiology
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I007938/1]
  6. National Institute for Health Research [PHR/11/3005/31]
  7. UK Department of Energy and Climate Change
  8. EPSRC [EP/K011839/1, EP/I038810/1, EP/I02929X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. ESRC [ES/L007517/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. NERC [NE/I007938/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L007517/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K011839/1, EP/I038810/1, EP/I02929X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. National Institute for Health Research [11/3005/31] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I007938/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess potential public health impacts of changes to indoor air quality and temperature due to energy efficiency retrofits in English dwellings to meet 2030 carbon reduction targets. Design: Health impact modelling study. Setting: England. Participants: English household population. Intervention: Three retrofit scenarios were modelled: (1) fabric and ventilation retrofits installed assuming building regulations are met; (2) as with scenario (1) but with additional ventilation for homes at risk of poor ventilation; (3) as with scenario (1) but with no additional ventilation to illustrate the potential risk of weak regulations and non-compliance. Main outcome: Primary outcomes were changes in quality adjusted life years (QALYs) over 50 years from cardiorespiratory diseases, lung cancer, asthma and common mental disorders due to changes in indoor air pollutants, including secondhand tobacco smoke, PM2.5 from indoor and outdoor sources, radon, mould, and indoor winter temperatures. Results: The modelling study estimates showed that scenario (1) resulted in positive effects on net mortality and morbidity of 2241 (95% credible intervals (CI) 2085 to 2397) QALYs per 10 000 persons over 50 years follow-up due to improved temperatures and reduced exposure to indoor pollutants, despite an increase in exposure to outdoor-generated particulate matter with a diameter of (2.5) mu m or less (PM2.5). Scenario (2) resulted in a negative impact of -728 (95% CI -864 to -592) QALYs per 10 000 persons over 50 years due to an overall increase in indoor pollutant exposures. Scenario (3) resulted in -539 (95% CI -678 to -399) QALYs per 10 000 persons over 50 years follow-up due to an increase in indoor exposures despite the targeting of pollutants. Conclusions: If properly implemented alongside ventilation, energy efficiency retrofits in housing can improve health by reducing exposure to cold and air pollutants. Maximising the health benefits requires careful understanding of the balance of changes in pollutant exposures, highlighting the importance of ventilation to mitigate the risk of poor indoor air quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据