4.5 Review

Global Non-Potential Magnetic Models of the Solar Corona During the March 2015 Eclipse

期刊

SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 214, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-018-0534-1

关键词

Magnetic fields; Sun: surface magnetism; Sun: corona

资金

  1. HPC resources of CINES/IDRIS [2016-16050438]
  2. UK STFC
  3. US Air Force Office for Scientific Research
  4. Leverhulme Trust
  5. NASA [NNX15AN43G, NNX15AB65G]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41531073]
  7. DFG [WI 3211/5-1]
  8. NASA
  9. NSF
  10. AFOSR
  11. National Science Foundation Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Program
  12. National Science Foundation
  13. Leverhulme Foundation
  14. STFC PRD grant
  15. STFC [ST/N000781/1, ST/N000609/1, ST/N002962/1, ST/K000950/1, ST/H001964/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seven different models are applied to the same problem of simulating the Sun's coronal magnetic field during the solar eclipse on 2015 March 20. All of the models are non-potential, allowing for free magnetic energy, but the associated electric currents are developed in significantly different ways. This is not a direct comparison of the coronal modelling techniques, in that the different models also use different photospheric boundary conditions, reflecting the range of approaches currently used in the community. Despite the significant differences, the results show broad agreement in the overall magnetic topology. Among those models with significant volume currents in much of the corona, there is general agreement that the ratio of total to potential magnetic energy should be approximately 1.4. However, there are significant differences in the electric current distributions; while static extrapolations are best able to reproduce active regions, they are unable to recover sheared magnetic fields in filament channels using currently available vector magnetogram data. By contrast, time-evolving simulations can recover the filament channel fields at the expense of not matching the observed vector magnetic fields within active regions. We suggest that, at present, the best approach may be a hybrid model using static extrapolations but with additional energization informed by simplified evolution models. This is demonstrated by one of the models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据