4.5 Review

A Combined Analysis of the Observational Aspects of the Quasi-biennial Oscillation in Solar Magnetic Activity

期刊

SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 186, 期 1-4, 页码 359-386

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-014-0068-0

关键词

Sun: activity; Sun: magnetic fields

资金

  1. International Space Science Institute
  2. Russian Academy of Sciences
  3. Institute of Advanced Study, University of Warwick
  4. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  5. Leverhulme trust
  6. European Research Council under the SeismoSun Research Project [321141]
  7. BK21 plus program through the National Research Foundation - Ministry of Education of Korea
  8. STFC [ST/I000720/1, ST/F00205X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F00205X/1, ST/I000720/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solar quasi-biennial oscillations (QBOs) with the time scale of 0.6-4 yrs appear to be a basic feature of the Sun's activity. Observational aspects of QBOs are reviewed on the basis of recent publications. Solar QBOs are shown to be ubiquitous and very variable. We demonstrate that many features of QBOs are common to different observations. These features include variable periodicity and intermittence with signs of stochastisity, a presence at all levels of the solar atmosphere and even in the convective zone, independent development in the northern and southern solar hemispheres, most pronounced amplitudes during the maximum phase of the 11-yr cycle and the transition of QBOs into interplanetary space. Temporal weakening of solar activity around the maximum of the 11-yr cycle (Gnevyshev Gap) can be considered an integral part of QBOs. The exact mechanism by which the solar QBO is produced is poorly understood. We describe some of the most plausible theoretical mechanisms and discuss observational features that support/contradict the theory. QBOs have an important meaning as a benchmark of solar activity, not only for investigation of the solar dynamo but also in terms of space weather.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据