4.5 Review

Flux Transport Dynamos: From Kinematics to Dynamics

期刊

SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 186, 期 1-4, 页码 561-602

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-014-0099-6

关键词

Sun; Solar cycle; Dynamo

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [11173033]
  2. National Science Foundation of the U.S.A.
  3. National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. JC Bose Fellowship - Department of Science and Technology of India
  5. [MMH09AK14I]
  6. [NNX11AJ36G]
  7. [NNX13AG18G]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the past several decades, Flux-Transport Dynamo (FTD) models have emerged as a popular paradigm for explaining the cyclic nature of solar magnetic activity. Their defining characteristic is the key role played by the mean meridional circulation in transporting magnetic flux and thereby regulating the cycle period. Most FTD models also incorporate the so-called Babcock-Leighton (BL) mechanism in which the mean poloidal field is produced by the emergence and subsequent dispersal of bipolar active regions. This feature is well grounded in solar observations and provides a means for assimilating observed surface flows and fields into the models in order to forecast future solar activity, to identify model biases, and to clarify the underlying physical processes. Furthermore, interpreting historical sunspot records within the context of FTD models can potentially provide insight into why cycle features such as amplitude and duration vary and what causes extreme events such as Grand Minima. Though they are generally robust in a modeling sense and make good contact with observed cycle features, FTD models rely on input physics that is only partially constrained by observation and that neglects the subtleties of convective transport, convective field generation, and nonlinear feedbacks. Here we review the formulation and application of FTD models and assess our current understanding of the input physics based largely on complementary 3D MHD simulations of solar convection, dynamo action, and flux emergence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据