4.5 Review

Properties of Ground Level Enhancement Events and the Associated Solar Eruptions During Solar Cycle 23

期刊

SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 171, 期 1-4, 页码 23-60

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-012-9890-4

关键词

CME; Solar flare; GLE; Shock; Radio bursts; SEP

资金

  1. NASA [NNX09AT38A, NNX10AL50A]
  2. NASA [108104, NNX10AL50A, 129433, NNX09AT38A] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solar cycle 23 witnessed the most complete set of observations of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) associated with the Ground Level Enhancement (GLE) events. We present an overview of the observed properties of the GLEs and those of the two associated phenomena, viz., flares and CMEs, both being potential sources of particle acceleration. Although we do not find a striking correlation between the GLE intensity and the parameters of flares and CMEs, the solar eruptions are very intense involving X-class flares and extreme CME speeds (average similar to 2000 km/s). An M7.1 flare and a 1200 km/s CME are the weakest events in the list of 16 GLE events. Most (80 %) of the CMEs are full halos with the three non-halos having widths in the range 167 to 212 degrees. The active regions in which the GLE events originate are generally large: 1290 msh (median 1010 msh) compared to 934 msh (median: 790 msh) for SEP-producing active regions. For accurate estimation of the CME height at the time of metric type II onset and GLE particle release, we estimated the initial acceleration of the CMEs using flare and CME observations. The initial acceleration of GLE-associated CMEs is much larger (by a factor of 2) than that of ordinary CMEs (2.3 km/s(2) vs. 1 km/s(2)). We confirmed the initial acceleration for two events for which CME measurements are available in the inner corona. The GLE particle release is delayed with respect to the onset of all electromagnetic signatures of the eruptions: type II bursts, low frequency type III bursts, soft X-ray flares and CMEs. The presence of metric type II radio bursts some 17 min (median: 16 min; range: 3 to 48 min) before the GLE onset indicates shock formation well before the particle release. The release of GLE particles occurs when the CMEs reach an average height of similar to 3.09 R (s) (median: 3.18 R (s) ; range: 1.71 to 4.01 R (s) ) for well-connected events (source longitude in the range W20-W90). For poorly connected events, the average CME height at GLE particle release is similar to 66 % larger (mean: 5.18 R (s) ; median: 4.61 R (s) ; range: 2.75-8.49 R (s) ). The longitudinal dependence is consistent with shock accelerations because the shocks from poorly connected events need to expand more to cross the field lines connecting to an Earth observer. On the other hand, the CME height at metric type II burst onset has no longitudinal dependence because electromagnetic signals do not require magnetic connectivity to the observer. For several events, the GLE particle release is very close to the time of first appearance of the CME in the coronagraphic field of view, so we independently confirmed the CME height at particle release. The CME height at metric type II burst onset is in the narrow range 1.29 to 1.8 R (s) , with mean and median values of 1.53 and 1.47 R (s) . The CME heights at metric type II burst onset and GLE particle release correspond to the minimum and maximum in the Alfv,n speed profile. The increase in CME speed between these two heights suggests an increase in Alfv,nic Mach number from 2 to 3. The CME heights at GLE particle release are in good agreement with those obtained from the velocity dispersion analysis (Reames in Astrophys. J. 693:812, 2009a; Astrophys. J. 706:844, 2009b) including the source longitude dependence. We also discuss the implications of the delay of GLE particle release with respect to complex type III bursts by similar to 18 min (median: 16 in; range: 2 to 44 min) for the flare acceleration mechanism. A similar analysis is also performed on the delay of particle release relative to the hard X-ray emission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据