4.6 Article

Carotid atherosclerosis and cardiovascular health metrics in old subjects from the AGES-Reykjavik study

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 242, 期 1, 页码 65-70

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.06.043

关键词

Carotid arteries; Imaging; Cardiovascular health score

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [N01-AG-1-2100]
  2. Intramural Research Program, Hjartavernd (Icelandic Heart Association)
  3. Althingi (Icelandic Parliament)
  4. RANNIS (The Icelandic Research Fund) [090452]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Ideal cardiovascular (CV) health by simultaneous presence of 7 ideal health metrics (blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose, smoking, BMI, physical activity and diet) has been defined by the American Heart Association. In the current study we investigated the association of a CV health score (range 0-14), on the extent and progression of carotid atherosclerosis, assessed as carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and total plaque area (TPA) by ultrasound at 5 years interval. Methods and results: A total of 219 participants (age 75.6 +/- 5.1) from the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility (AGES)-Reykjavik study were studied. Men with poor (low) CV health score had greater TPA than those with more optimal (high) score (61.5 (SD: 32.3), 44.4 (24.2) and 37.7 (23.2) mm(2) for those with CV health score <= 6, 7-9 and >= 10 respectively, p < 0.05). In linear analysis for men, log TPA was 0.088 mm(2) (SE: 0.040 p < 0.05) smaller for each additional point in the CV health score. CV health score was not associated with TPA in women, or cIMT in either sex. TPA increased in both sexes between visits. However, CV health score did not predict carotid atherosclerosis progression. Conclusions: CV health score is associated with TPA in older men but not in women. Men with poor CV health score at the baseline visit had more extensive carotid atherosclerosis than those with better CV health score, although it did not predict the progression of carotid atherosclerosis. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据