4.6 Article

A knee monitoring device and the preferences of patients living with osteoarthritis: a qualitative study

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 5, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007980

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Engineering Solutions in Osteoarthritis Centre of Excellence - Wellcome Trust
  2. EPSRC [088844/Z/09/Z]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To identify perspective of patients with osteoarthritis, in particular design requirements and mode of use, of wearable technology to support the rehabilitation pathway. This study is part of a user-centred design approach adopted to develop a rehabilitation tool for patients with osteoarthritis. Design: Qualitative study using a focus group approach; data management via a thematic analysis of patients' responses. Participants: 21 patients with osteoarthritis (age range 45-65 years) participated in 1 of the 4 focus groups. Recruitment continued until data saturation. Setting: The study was conducted in a university setting. Results: Main determinants of user acceptance of a wearable technology were appearance and comfort during use. Patients were supportive of the use of wearable technologies during rehabilitation and could recognise their benefit as monitors for their progress, incentives to adhere to exercise, and tools for more informed interaction with clinicians. Conclusions: This paper should encourage adoption and development of wearable technology to support rehabilitation of patients with osteoarthritis. It is pivotal that technological development takes into account patients' views in that it should be small, light, discrete, not 'appear medical' or challenge the identity of the user. Derived data should be available to patients and clinicians. Furthermore, wearable technologies should be developed to operate in two modes: for exercise guidance and assessment only, and for unobtrusive everyday monitoring. The information obtained from this study should guide the design of new technologies and support their use in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据