4.2 Article

Decay of eddies at the South-West Indian Ridge

期刊

SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE
卷 107, 期 11-12, 页码 14-23

出版社

ACAD SCIENCE SOUTH AFRICA A S S AF
DOI: 10.4102/sajs.v107i11/12.673

关键词

-

资金

  1. South African National Antarctic Programme
  2. University of Cape Town
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [noc010010, noc010005] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NERC [noc010010, noc010005] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The South-West Indian Ridge in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean is a region recognised for the creation of particularly intense eddy disturbances in the mean flow of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Eddies formed at this ridge have been extensively studied over the past decade using hydrographic, satellite, drifter and float data and it is hypothesised that they could provide a vehicle for localised meridional heat and salt exchange. The effectiveness of this process is dependent on the rate of decay of the eddies. However, in order to investigate eddy decay, logistically difficult hydrographic monitoring is required. This study presents the decay of cold eddies at the South-West Indian Ridge, using outputs from a high-resolution ocean model. The model's representation of the dynamic nature of this region is fully characteristic of observations. On average, 3-4 intense and well-defined cold eddies are generated per year; these eddies have mean longevities of 5.0 +/- 2.2 months with average advection speeds of 5 +/- 2 km/day. Most simulated eddies reach their peak intensity within 1.5-2.5 months after genesis and have depths of 2000 m - 3000 m. Thereafter they dissipate within approximately 3 months. The decay of eddies is generally characterised by a decrease in their sea surface height signature, a weakening in their rotation rates and a modification in their temperature-salinity characteristics. Subantarctic top predators are suspected to forage preferentially along the edges of eddies. The process of eddy dissipation may thus influence their feeding behaviour.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据