4.5 Article

Ecophysiological requirements on seed germination of a Mediterranean perennial grass (Stipa tenacissima L.) under controlled temperatures and water stress

期刊

SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 210-217

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2014.07.008

关键词

Seed germination; Steppes; Stipa tenacissima L.; Temperature; Water potential

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stipa tenacissima L. (alpha grass) steppes are one of the most representative ecosystems in arid Mediterranean ecosystems. On the one hand these steppes, which are perpetually exposed to climate and strong anthropogenic pressure, have undergone severe degradation. On the other hand, the ability of S. tenacissima to regenerate naturally is significantly reduced. In this study the germination response and seedling emergence of S. tenacissima are examined in relation to the main environmental factors (water stress and temperature) under laboratory-controlled conditions. The main aim of this paper was to investigate the influence of temperature over a temperature range (10 degrees C-30 degrees C) and water stress induced by the solutions of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-6000 (0 to -1.6 MPa) for a period of 30 days, on the germination behavior of S. tenacissima seeds. The results showed that temperatures between 10 degrees and 20 degrees C seem to be favorable for the germination of this species, with optimum temperatures among accessions found in 20 degrees C. When seeds were water-stressed, germination severely decreased at -0.8 MPa, indicating that the accession resistance limits to the water stress, and was completely inhibited at -1.6 MPa. Consequently, the final germination percentage (FGP) decreased and the mean time germination (MTG) increased. Based on the empirical data of the germination rate, we estimated that the parameters of the thermal time and hydrotime models showed different values in all accessions which proves the difference between accession adaptive capacities. (C) 2014 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据