4.5 Article

Interactive effects of salt and alkali stresses on seed germination, germination recovery, and seedling growth of a halophyte Spartina alterniflora (Poaceae)

期刊

SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 76, 期 2, 页码 380-387

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2010.01.004

关键词

Germination recovery; Salt-alkaline mixed stress; Seed germination; Seedling growth; Spartina alterniflora

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30470179]
  2. Cooperative Program of Agriculture Science and Technology between China and Japan [0504018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil salinization and alkalinization frequently co-occur in nature, but there is little information on the interactive effects of salt and alkali stresses on plants. Seed germination and early seedling growth are crucial stages for plant establishment. We investigated the interactive effects of salt and alkali stresses on seed germination, germination recovery and seedling growth of a halophyte Spartina alterniflora. Seed germination percentage was not significantly reduced at low salinity (<= 200 mM) at pH 6.63-9.95, but decreased with increased salinity and pH. Ungerminated seeds germinated well after transfer to distilled water from treatment solutions, indicating that seeds can remain viable in high salt alkaline habits. Shoot growth was stimulated at low salinity and pH, but decreased with increased salinity and pH. Radicle elongation decreased sharply with increased salinity and pH, and was significantly inhibited when pH >= 9.0, indicating that the radicles are very sensitive to salt alkaline stress. The deleterious effects of salinity or high pH alone were less than when combined. A reciprocal enhancement of salt and alkali stresses is a characteristic feature for salt alkaline stress. Stepwise regression analysis indicates that salinity is the dominant factor, while pH and buffer capacity are secondary for salt alkaline mixed stress. (C) 2010 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据