4.5 Article

Bioactivity of selected essential oils and some components on Listeria monocytogenes biofilms

期刊

SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 76, 期 4, 页码 676-680

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2010.07.002

关键词

Clove; Essential oils; Lemongrass; Lippia; Listerial biofilm; Mentha spicata

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram-positive bacterium, able to survive and grow in water, soil, agricultural products, various foods and the food-processing environment The ubiquitous nature of the organism, coupled with its ability to colonise food-processing surfaces by forming biofilms, causes it to be of a major concern to the industry Increased foodborne pathogen resistance and negative consumer perceptions regarding the use of synthetic bacteriocides, has resulted in natural antimicrobials being sourced from the plant kingdom The listerial antibiofilm activities of Syzygium aromaticum (clove), Mentha spicata (spearmint), Lippia rehmannu and Cymbopogon citratus (lemongrass) essential oils and their major components were evaluated using the crystal violet assay and confocal scanning laser microscopy Listerial biofilms treated with S aromaticum or M spicata essential oils, or the pure compounds nerol and citral, exhibited a similar biofilm biomass to the positive control However, the essential oils of lemongrass, L rehmannu, eugenol and R-carvone caused biofilm enhancement, rather than inhibition L rehmannu and lemongrass essential oils did not display any antibiofilm properties Results obtained were confirmed by microscopic observations indicating either a reduction (inhibition) or an Increase (enhancement) in biofilm biomass when exposed to the essential oils or pure compounds The present study revealed that M spicata and S aromaticum essential oils as well as pure citral and nerol are good candidates for further development of ecofriendly disinfectants (C) 2010 SAAB Published by Elsevier B V All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据