4.5 Article

Treatment of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with direct hemoperfusion using a polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column improves survival

期刊

BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-015-0004-4

关键词

Acute exacerbation; Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; Hemoperfusion; Polymyxin; PMX-DHP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) has an extremely poor prognosis and there is currently no effective treatment for this condition. Direct hemoperfusion with a polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column (PMX-DHP) improves oxygenation, but it is unclear whether treatment of AE-IPF with PMX-DHP affects survival. This study elucidated the effectiveness and safety of PMX-DHP for the treatment of AE-IPF. Methods: This study included 31 patients with 41 episodes of AE-IPF. All patients received steroids. Of 31, 14 patients (20 episodes) were treated with PMX-DHP. The laboratory and physiological test results after the start of therapy and survival were retrospectively compared between patients treated with and without PMX-DHP. Results: Patients treated with PMX-DHP had a significantly greater change in PaO2/FiO(2) ratio (mean +/- SEM, 58.2 +/- 22.5 vs. 0.7 +/- 13.3, p = 0.034) and a smaller change in white blood cell count (-630 +/- 959 /mu L vs. 4500 +/- 1190 /mu L, p = 0.002) after 2 days of treatment than patients treated without PMX-DHP. The 12-month survival rate was significantly higher in patients treated with PMX-DHP (48.2% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.041). PMX-DHP was effective in patients with more severe underlying disease (GAP stages II or III; 12-month survival rate 57.1% with PMX-DHP vs. 0% without PMX-DHP, p = 0.021). Treatment with PMX-DHP was an independent predictor of better prognosis (hazard ratio 0.345, p = 0.037). Mild pulmonary thromboembolism occurred in one patient treated with PMX-DHP. Conclusions: Treatment of AE-IPF with PMX-DHP is tolerable and improves 12-month survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据