4.3 Article

Growth of ZnO:Al films by RF sputtering at room temperature for solar cell applications

期刊

SOLID-STATE ELECTRONICS
卷 53, 期 11, 页码 1149-1153

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.sse.2009.07.006

关键词

Aluminum-doped ZnO (ZnO:Al) films; RF sputtering; Room temperature; Copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) solar cells

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10774046]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Committee [09JC1404600, 0852nm06100, 08230705400]
  3. Special Project for Shanghai R&D Public Service Platform [07DZ22944]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aluminum-doped ZnO (ZnO:Al) films were prepared at room temperature in pure argon ambient on glass substrates by RF magnetron sputtering. The influence of sputtering power, deposition pressure and film thickness on the film properties was investigated. The deposited ZnO:Al films were characterized to examine the electrical, optical, and structural properties for the application of thin copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) solar cells. The deposition parameters of ZnO:Al films were optimized. The optimized ZnO:AI films showed a strong and sharp (0 0 2) X-ray diffraction peak. The 600-800 nm thick ZnO-Al films showed a high transparency above 85% in the visible range and a sheet resistance low to 10 Omega/square. CIGS solar cells with 1.2 mu m thick absorbers were fabricated using bi-layer ZnO films (low resistive and thick ZnO:Al/high resistive and transparent thin i-ZnO) as front contacts. The thin absorber layers were prepared by the low cost technique involving co-sputtering of Cu-Ga alloy and In targets and selenization with Se powders. Efficiencies of the order of 6-7% were achieved for the manufactured thin CIGS solar cells without antireflective films. The results demonstrated that RF sputtered ZnO:Al films are suitable for application in low cost and thin CIGS solar cells as transparent conductive electrode layers. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据