4.5 Article

Synthesis and lithium-ion conductivity for perovskite-type Li3/8Sr7/16Ta3/4Zr1/4O3 solid electrolyte by powder-bed sintering

期刊

SOLID STATE IONICS
卷 261, 期 -, 页码 95-99

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2014.04.005

关键词

Perovskite; Li(3/8)Sr(7/16)Ta(3/4)Zr1/O-4(3); Solid electrolyte; Powder-bed sintering; Lithium ion conductivity

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI Grant [26630111]
  2. Research Foundation for the Electrotechnology of Chubu [R-25209]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26630111] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perovskite-type compounds ABO(3) in which A = La, Li and B = Ti (Li-2/3 - 3(x)La(x)TiO(3), LLT) exhibit very high bulk ionic conductivity of 1.2 x 10(-3) S cm(-1) at 30 degrees C, but LLT has very large grain-boundary resistance and is only stable above 1.6-1.8 V vs. Li/Li+ because Ti4+ can be easily reduced to Ti3+ below this potential. Li3/8Sr7/16Ta3/4Zr1/4O3 (LSTZ), in which A and B cations of SrZrO3 are partially substituted by Li and Ta, has been reported to be more stable against the lithiated negative electrode than LLT. In this paper, we synthesized LSTZ by using powder-bed sintering method, which is commonly used for preparation of dense garnet-structured lithium-ion conductor Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZ). At sintering process, the LSTZ pellet was covered with the same mother powder to suppress the excess Li loss during high temperature treatment and the formation of secondary phases. For LSTZ sintered with covering LSTZ mother powder, secondary phases such as SrTa2O6 and Sr2Ta2O7 Were significantly reduced and LSTZ grains in the pellet were in good contact with each other. According to these improvement, the bulk and total (bulk + grain-boundary) ionic conductivity at 27 degrees C of LSTZ attained to 3.5 x 10(-4) S cm(-1) and 2.7 x 10(-4) S cm 1, respectively. The total conductivity at room temperature is approximately 3 times higher than that as previously reported and comparable with LLT and LIZ. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据