4.5 Article

Spectroscopic analyses of 0.5Li[Ni0.8Co0.15Zr0.05]O2-0.5Li[Li1/3Mn2/3]O2 composite cathodes for lithium rechargeable batteries

期刊

SOLID STATE IONICS
卷 181, 期 15-16, 页码 730-739

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2010.04.006

关键词

Rechargeable lithium batteries; Composite cathode materials; Electrochemical properties; Rietveld refinement; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; Raman spectroscopy

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research Vide [80(0066)/06/EMR-II]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work we have investigated the lithium ion intercalation behavior in wet chemical synthesized 0.5Li[Ni0.8Co0.15Zr0.05]O-2-0.5Li[Li1/3Mn2/3]O-2 composite cathodes. Impedance spectroscopy in conjunction with micro-Raman spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements are performed to understand the lithium ion intercalation behavior in these composite cathodes. The Rietveld refinement of the X-ray diffractograms of the cathode powder indicates a hexagonal layered structure and minimal transitional metal cation disorder between lithium and (transition) metal layers. Probing the localized region by micro-Raman spectroscopy, it is found that in virgin cathode, monoclinic Li[Li1/3Mn2/3]O-2 forms composite with hexagonal layered Li[Ni0.8Co0.15Zr0.05]O-2 component. Interestingly, these cathodes transform into a hexagonal layered structure upon charging similar to 4.8 V. The galvanostatic charge-discharge characteristics of these composite cathode is reported in the cut-off voltage limits of 4.8-1.45 V. Detailed X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses of the valence states of the constituent elements are performed in virgin, fully charged and partial discharged states of the cathodes. Through the XPS analyses, the charge and discharge capacities of these cathodes are found to be due to Ni3+/Ni4+, Co3+/Co4+ and Ni2+/Ni3+ redox couples. The capacity of these composite cathodes is deteriorated when cycled repeatedly between the voltage limits of 4.8-1.45 V. The probable reasons for such findings are discussed. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据